Showing posts with label Orlando Liposuction. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Orlando Liposuction. Show all posts

Monday, August 15, 2011

Dr. Armando Soto on Fox's Good Day Orlando!

I wanted to recap for readers the essentials of my discussion with Michelle of Fox 35 Orlando this morning, as well as elaborate on the important things to know and ask before allowing anyone to do any kind of elective plastic surgery procedure on you.

This discussion was of course brought about by the recent events in the Phoenix area, where a local ER doctor was accused, indicted, and then convicted of second degree murder and manslaughter after 3 of his patients died while undergoing (or shortly thereafter) liposuction.

The case is noteworthy not just because of the fact that 3 human beings unfortunately lost their lives during procedures that should have been very safe for healthy people like them, but because the doctor was found guilty of MURDER, and not just of malpractice.

To review, the prosecutors successfully argued that as Dr. Peter Normann was intelligent enough to complete medical school and training in Emergency Medicine, he should also have been intelligent enough to understand that his complete lack of legitimate training in plastic surgery and liposuction (he took a weekend course) constituted an untoward risk for his patients. In other words, Duh! You're an ER doctor- probably shouldn't be doing liposuction on people.

Furthermore, they reasoned that he should also have had the wherewithal to know that his advertising a level of expertise in these procedures that he clearly did not have, along with his lack of training, and the fact that he performed the procedures in a facility without appropriate accreditation was fundamentally wrong...

Therefore, they concluded that he clearly showed more regard for his income than for his patient's safety, and displayed what they (the prosecutors) called an "extreme indifference" to human life, which met the guidelines for murder in the second degree.

Scary.

So- what should we all take away from this?

Well first of all, as a plastic surgeon, clearly it would be wrong for me to offer to do heart surgery on a patient- as cool as it would be to be able to say I do heart surgery AND plastic surgery, I know it would be wrong.

The amazing thing is that it would NOT be illegal.... At least not if I could talk someone into letting me do it on them in my office under local anesthesia.

And that's a big part of how so many unfortunate patients wind up injured or dead after cosmetic surgery.

Historically, what kept doctors "honest" and prevented them from trying to do procedures on people that they were incompetent to perform, was the hospital credentialing system.

We'll use myself as an example... If I (as a trained Plastic Surgeon certified by The American Board of Plastic Surgery) wanted to obtain privileges at a hospital for the performance of liposuction, I would need to submit a great deal of paperwork to the hospital's Credentialing Committee proving that I had received legitimate, ACGME approved training in plastic surgery and liposuction.

The ACGME, or Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, is the body that judges whether residency training a doctor receives is adequate and appropriate before letting them say they are trained in the discipline. From their website:
    
  • The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education is a private, nonprofit council that evaluates and accredits medical residency programs in the United States.

  • The ACGME was established in 1981 from a consensus in the academic medical community for an independent accrediting organization. Its forerunner was the Liaison Committee for Graduate Medical Education, established in 1972.

  • The mission of the ACGME is to improve health care by assessing and advancing the quality of resident physicians’ education through exemplary accreditation. 

If I, on the other hand, asked for privileges performing heart surgery in the same hospital, my request would be quickly denied (and I would probably even be denied privileges in procedures I can prove competence in- just for asking to do something so far outside my area of training) because I would be unable to provide proof of ACGME accredited training in this discipline.

But here's the thing.... What if I could convince people to let me try doing heart surgery on them in my office under local anesthesia? 

By avoiding the hospital, I've also avoided the Credentialing Committee. 

And there is no law to stop me from doing whatever I want to patients in my office, as long as I have their (the patient's) permission to do it. 

It's true- if you were dumb enough to let me charm you into having heart surgery under local anesthesia in my office, I could legally do it. The outcome may not be so good, but I could do it.

And that's why I always tell people that if you could only ask your provider one question, the most important one would be, "Do you have privileges to perform the operation you are proposing for me in a hospital?" (but don't take their word for it- call the hospital and check).

Now heart surgery in an office setting is so obviously ridiculous that there are probably very few people alive who would consent to it (although someone probably would).

But what about if we were talking about liposuction? How hard would it be to distract you from the fact that I might not have the proper training in the procedure and fool you into letting me do it on you?

What if I were able to convince you that the machine I use in my office makes it so easy that you're not really having surgery at all, but rather a "minimally invasive" fat removal? 

What if I convinced you that I'm the only one in town who knows how to do it- by giving my procedure a cute name? 

What if I (fraudulently) advertised that my procedure was fundamentally different and better than liposuction, and that there was minimal or no downtime? 

What if I (falsely) told you that having it done under local anesthesia was "safer" because you don't need general anesthesia? 

Now it's not so hard to understand how otherwise intelligent people might put their happiness and safety in the wrong hands, is it?

And believe it or not, there are ER doctors, gynecologists, and an eye doctor here in Central Florida making all of these claims.

So let's all realize the following:
  1. All liposuction is surgery. It doesn't matter what machine is being used, or how you're anesthetized. If someone is removing fat from your body through an incision, however small, you're having surgery.

  2. All surgery has risks (just ask the families of the 3 patients who died in Dr. Normann's OR)

  3. You can minimize your risks by choosing the right surgeon, the right facility, and the right anesthesia provider- and all 3 are important.

  4. Conversely, your risks of a bad outcome are much greater if you let yourself be fooled into having plastic surgery performed by someone who does not have legitimate, ACGME training in plastic surgery.

And with regard to the last point- make no mistake about it, Dr. Normann was not an isolated numbskull. Every large community in America now has ER doctors, gynecologists, family doctors, and even an eye doctor (here in Orlando) calling themselves liposuction experts, despite a lack of ACGME accredited training in the procedure.

How do you protect yourself and those you love? 
  • Do as much research as you can

    • Research the surgeon

      • What was his training in?

      • Is he Board Certified- and just as important- by WHICH BOARD?

      • Where was his training?

    • Research the facility in which the procedure is to be performed

      • Is it accredited? Ask to see the certificate

      • By whom? Make sure the facility is accredited by The AAAASF or JCAHO

    • Research the anesthesia provider

      • Who is taking care of you while you are having surgery is just as important as who is doing the surgery!

      • Is it an anesthesiologist (a doctor of anesthesia)?  PREFERRED

      • A certified nurse anesthetist? LESS IDEAL

      • The surgeon himself or a nurse??  BE VERY CONCERNED


Finally, where can you look for these important answers?  Here you go...
  1. Check the website for the State Medical Board in the state in which you live. You can learn about the doctor's training (or lack thereof) and much more. For Florida, the link is:  http://ww2.doh.state.fl.us/IRM00profiling/searchform.asp

  2. You can also check reputable doctor review sites. The word reputable is critical here... more on that later. The very best is www.RealSelf.com

    1. What makes it the best? Quite simply:

    2. It is complete- there is a wealth of information about doctors, their training, and their outcomes

    3. It is fair- Realself balances doctor's legitimate concerns against patient's in the most fair fashion of the sites out there right now. As I will write about in the near future, there is no perfect site, but this is as good as there is at the present time.

    4. Realself requires doctors market honestly, and only in the specialty in which they actually are trained. Critical.

And finally, if you are still uncertain about a doctor you have seen, email me and I can help you figure out what their training was all about- 

And for those cynics out there-- this is not about me feeling competitive. As long as you are in the hands of a Board Certified Plastic Surgeon, I'm good. 

It's the damage done to the reputation of ALL plastic surgeons and plastic surgery itself by injuries and deaths caused by non-plastic surgeons that I'm trying to prevent here.

Tuesday, July 26, 2011

Plastic Surgery by a Non-Plastic Surgeon?

Reprinted from The Arizona Republic:



Liposuction deaths: Phoenix area doctor convicted of murder, manslaughter


by Michael Kiefer - Jul. 15, 2011 10:28 PM
The Arizona Republic


An Anthem physician who had three patients die during plastic-surgery procedures in his clinic was found guilty of murder and manslaughter Friday in Maricopa County Superior Court.


Dr. Peter Normann was pronounced guilty of second-degree murder in the deaths of Ralph Gonzalez, 33, of Scottsdale, and Leslie Ann Ray, 53, of California, and of manslaughter for the death of Alicia Santizo Blanco, 41, of Gilbert.


Throughout the trial, which began June 10, Normann's attorneys, John Johnsonand Vikki Liles, maintained that the deaths were accidental, the result of known risks of plastic surgery, and claimed that if Normann, 50, were found guilty, it would mean that all doctors would be liable for procedures gone wrong.




Autopsy findings had listed the deaths as accidental.


But in her closing arguments earlier this week, Deputy County Attorney Jeannette Gallagher said the "combination of incompetence and arrogance in trying to cover up his (Normann's) incompetence led to their deaths."


Gallagher claimed that two of the deaths constituted second-degree murder because of Normann's "extreme indifference to human life," and the third death was manslaughter because of Normann's "conscious disregard of substantial and unjustified risk of death."


After a day and a half of deliberation, the jury came back supporting Gallagher's side of the story.


Normann's friends and family were surprised at the verdict.


"He is not the monster he's been painted to be," said his friend Cindy Jones. "He's a pure, sweet man."


Liles said she and Johnson plan to file a motion for a new trial, claiming that Gallagher had committed perjury in insisting that Normann did not have inventory of a drug that could have saved the lives of one or more of the patients.


Normann had been an emergency-room physician, certified as an internist, and had never done a residency in plastic surgery or anesthesiology.


Gallagher maintained he had undergone six days of training in liposuction and had done some "hands-on training" in liposuction and breast augmentation. He had never done training in fat augmentation, Gallagher said.


Furthermore, she said, his operating room lacked proper oxygen and monitoring equipment, and he worked without anesthesiologists or nurses, relying on a massage therapist and a former restaurant worker with little or no training as medical technicians.


The massage therapist, who assisted in surgery, has already pleaded guilty to eight counts of unlawful practice of medicine and was sentenced last year to five years in prison.


Gonzalez stopped breathing during liposuction in December 2006, due to what Gallagher called a lethal dose of lidocaine, which is used in the procedure. Then, she claimed, Normann mistakenly inserted a breathing tube into Gonzalez's esophagus instead of his trachea, depriving him of oxygen.


When paramedics arrived, they noted that Gonzalez's belly was distended because of the oxygen being pumped into his stomach instead of into his lungs, and they maintained that they tussled with Normann, who insisted on riding in the ambulance and refused to let the EMTs reinsert the tube correctly.


David Duarte, one of the paramedics, told The Republic after the verdict, "He physically was holding onto it, from the get-go."


Duarte threatened to break Normann's arm and then tricked him into letting go of the tube so he could pull it out. Normann insisted on reinserting another.


Duarte said he filed complaints against Normann with the hospital and the state medical board.


Santizo died in April 2007 during multiple procedures, including repositioning a badly placed breast implant, liposuction and an attempt to inject fat into her buttocks to enhance its shape.


During the fat augmentation, Gallagher said, Normann injected the fat directly into a vein, which carried it to her lungs and killed her.


As had occurred during Normann's attempts to resuscitate Gonzalez, Normann was unable to properly insert a breathing tube.


Duarte, coincidentally, was in the hospital when Santizo was brought in, and he filed another complaint.


After the second death, Normann agreed to a voluntary suspension of his medical license and he hired a homeopathic physician, Gary Page, to do liposuction. Gallagher maintained that as a homeopath, Page was not qualified or licensed to perform such procedures.


Ray had traveled from her home in Blythe, Calif., for the surgery in July 2007, which Page performed with no assistance, serving as surgeon, anesthesiologist and monitor.


After the surgery, Page left the clinic, and Ray was left in a recovery room, where later that night, Normann discovered her in respiratory distress because of a reaction to the combination of drugs she had been given. Normann was again unable to insert a breathing tube when she stopped breathing.


Page was charged with manslaughter in Ray's death, but on Friday, he pleaded guilty to the lesser felony charge of endangerment.


Normann will be sentenced Aug. 19 by Judge Paul McMurdie.

Over the past few years, several things have become clear to me about this significant patient safety issue:

  1. There are some people who will always knowingly and willingly put themselves at risk if doing so will allow them to save a few dollars... These patients probably cannot be helped.
  2. Some physicians are inherently more ethical and moral than others... in other words, and as I have stated many times in the past, the days when it was safe to assume that all doctors were honest professionals with high levels of moral character and integrity are unfortunately over
  3. Doctors with questionable ethics, morals, and training are capable of amazing acts of deceit (if not fraud) in order to attract patients and convince them to have surgery.
    • The eye doctor here in Orlando who advertises heavily as an expert in liposuction even gives procedures long established in the legitimate plastic surgery community cute, trendy sounding names ("Naturalfill") to make it seem to patients that he is the only one knowledgeable in the technique, and that he has somehow captured magic in a bottle. This violates the code of ethics of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons- but because he is an eye doctor and not a plastic surgeon, he does not have to comply with this important ethical code.
    • The same eye doctor advertises himself as "Board Certified", without saying in what or by whom. I believe this is actually a violation of Florida law- but again, no one will do anything about it until and unless there are complaints.
  4. The tragic truth (at least so far) has been that when patients are injured or deformed as a result of surgery performed on them by an ER doctor, Eye Doctor (or anyone else without plastic surgery residency training) they almost never complain to the appropriate authorities.
  5. Many Central Florida women don't realize that this problem is prevalent in their backyard. In Orlando alone, there are ER doctors, a urologist, and the eye doctor I describe (!) all claiming to be liposuction experts.
These last 2 facts are what I hope to contribute to changing.

I have found that for patients who have experienced the trauma of misplacing trust for their safety and happiness in someone other than a Board Certified Plastic Surgeon, the only thing that they believe could make their situation worse is to have to talk about how they ended up making the poor decisions that lead to their terrible outcome.

I've seen it over and over again in patients who come to see me for correction of problems resulting from surgery performed by local ER doctors and especially the local eye doctor... They want to have their problems corrected, but usually cringe at the notion of having to re-hash the experience as they would have to do if they complained to the authorities with the power to stop these untrained practitioners from practicing plastic surgery. I believe they behave very much like victims of sexual abuse...

Because there is a perceived stigma associated with being "duped" into compromising your safety and appearance, most of these patients won't complain...

But here's the problem... Unless and until patients injured and disfigured complain to authorities, the only way to stop untrained non-plastic surgeons from harming (or indeed killing) more patients is to wait for someone to die- this is the only circumstance that would require the state to investigate without a complaint. 

So unless someone dies, without people affected complaining, these doctors can go on performing procedures they are ill-trained to perform on unsuspecting patients- injuring more of them over time.

Please don't let yourself or someone you love be the victim of doctors practicing outside their training. And if you are, please contact the Florida Board of Medicine.




Thursday, June 2, 2011

Patient Empowerment is not the same as Entitlement...

Last week, here in my hometown of Orlando Florida, a young transplant surgeon was murdered by a former patient as he was leaving the hospital. Killed by someone whose life he had saved before he could go home to his young family after what I'm sure was a long and stressful day of work.

As you can probably already tell, I am more than a little disturbed by this...

Over the last 40 years or so, we have seen a general decline in the esteem and respect the general population feels towards the medical profession in general... people respect and trust doctors and scientists less and less, even as the demand for the rapid development of medical breakthroughs grows. We demand that our medical care be state of the art, be cheap, and be directed by us, and that if our outcomes are not exactly what we think they should have been, we want to be able to take it out on the doctor.

It is hard, in the end, for me to disagree with this overall decline, as I myself know better than most people how poorly some doctors behave. On the other hand, reason must prevail, and attempting to harm, injure, or kill your doctor because you didn't get exactly what you wanted is irrational and wrong.

The best outcomes, whether in my aesthetic surgery practice, or in any other type of medical practice, will ALWAYS come from healthy relationships based on mutual respect and commitment to the plan and its execution.

Having a healthy relationship with your doctors begins with a clear understanding that the relationship should be important to you, and that just as with any other important relationship, it will require work on your part to maintain. Placing an appropriate value on the relationship from the beginning will go a long way towards helping you appropriately weigh the advice you get from the doctors in your life, as well as improving the quality of the information you get- it's true... doctors are people too, and we tend to be more engaged when people are nice to us (remember the Golden Rule we learned in Kindergarten?)

You would not expect to have a long and successful marriage if it was one in which only one of you was committed to its success or the happiness and fulfillment of the other, would you? It is similarly impossible for doctor-patient relationships to be successful if patients believe that it is the doctor's responsibility to make them happy, no matter what their own behavior may be.

Just as with any other important relationship, you must communicate with your doctors- completely, honestly, and respectfully.

Too many people treat their doctor's visits like a trip to a restaurant, believing they should be able to request what they want and demand they get it, rather than understanding the partnership nature of healthier doctor-patient relationships, or the fact that the nuances of their problem may make their exact goals impossible. This leads to unreasonable expectations and irrational behavior when they are not met.

The importance of good communication cannot be over-emphasized- it is no more appropriate for patients to be demanding of unreasonable expectations for their outcomes than it is for doctors to be patronizing, condescending, and paternal in their communications with those patients.

The importance of having reasonable expectations is worth further emphasis.

The internet has brought many good things to the delivery of healthcare- patients are better educated at all stages of their care, and this generally contributes to better communication and higher rates of satisfaction. Unfortunately, in plastic surgery, it has also contributed to the occasional development of unrealistic expectations and the restaurant attitude I describe above. Some percentage of the population, when viewing the many before and after photographs available online sees them as choices available to them, or worse, as representations of what they themselves would actually look like if they had the same procedure.

The reality is that the science and art of plastic surgery are actually much more subtle, and the actual outcome any individual patient achieves will depend GREATLY on their individual preoperative anatomy, the details of the operative technique used, the skills and experience of the surgeon, the quality of the anesthesia and postoperative care, and their (the patient's) compliance with all postoperative instructions.

In other words, before and after photographs are valuable, but only as representations of the overall quality of a surgeon's work- NOT as detailed representations of what you as an individual should expect- your body is different than the patient in the photo.

It is very important that once you have found a surgeon whose work you admire, and with whom you think you could work constructively (that is, with whom you think you could have a good relationship), that you listen carefully to his or her estimation of what reasonable goals FOR YOU might be. And I do mean listen.

On the (thankfully) very few  occasions when I have had a patient dissatisfied after surgery, without fail, it has been because their expectations for what could be achieved were simply completely incompatible with their starting anatomy- despite my best efforts to educate them and their preoperative assurances of understanding (I even have one irrationally angry young woman who writes bad things about me on the internet because I could not make her congenitally deformed breasts look perfect).

The frustrating part of this is that spending a great deal of time and effort trying to help some people understand their reasonable expectations (as I did with the example patient I mention) does not seem to help if they are not listening and are only hearing what they want to hear...

And again, unfortunately, our modern attitudes towards medicine, doctors, and our unreasonable expectations for perfect outcomes sometimes causes a small and irrational subset of the population to react to the disappointment of an imperfect outcome in an unhealthy manner- like by writing ugly things about the doctor, or worse, murdering him.

I personally believe that, while there are certainly examples of doctors with inappropriate, unethical, and immoral motivations and practice patterns (indeed I write about them often), the majority of us are still honest, hardworking people who want the best for each of our patients. Even the eye doctor in town who (in my opinion) daily compromises his Hippocratic Oath by allowing patients to believe he is a plastic surgeon specializing in liposuction probably does not deserve to be shot. For this to have happened really should be inspiring more outrage among us all than is has.

Sunday, May 1, 2011

Legitimate Plastic Surgeons Fight for Their Name

This month, the monthly newsletter for the American Society of Plastic Surgeons published on their front page, an important article describing the problem I have been decrying for some time; a problem that seems to be getting worse, and is damaging the reputation of all of plastic surgery, and the safety and happiness of every prospective or real patient.

I speak of the problem of physicians without legitimate, ACGME accredited training in Plastic Surgery calling themselves plastic surgeons, or otherwise marketing themselves in such a deceptive manner as to allow an otherwise reasonable person to believe they were plastic surgeons.

The reason the article was written was because a patient in  Los Angeles recently died during a tummy tuck and liposuction procedure. The California Board of Medicine is likely to take his license. The headlines read, "Plastic Surgeon could lose license..."

Only the doctor was NOT a plastic surgeon. He had been offering plastic surgery procedures, and indeed marketed himself in a way that only an experienced and savvy physician would be able to tell that he was not a legitimately trained plastic surgeon, but in fact, he was an Ob/Gyn.

Close examination of the circumstances very quickly shows that this doctor had a very poor understanding of safe and appropriate care in these procedures, and it is clear that the death could have been prevented had the patient been in the hands of a surgeon certified by The American Board of Plastic Surgery.

The most shocking part of the story, however, is how little interest there was in the media in making a written correction and bringing the fact that the doctor was not a plastic surgeon to the public's attention. And this is part of why these deaths and injuries continue to mount.

The good news is that many state governments are now pursuing legislature mandating that all healthcare providers be honest and forthcoming in describing and marketing their educations and training to patients.
We'll have to keep a close eye on this....

Think this couldn't happen to you? Here in Central Florida, Dr. Roger Bassin calls his practice "Bassin Plastic Surgery" and his advertisements make it seem as though he is not only a plastic surgeon, but an innovative one in a position of leadership in the field. His training? Ophthalmology. He's an eye doctor.

Be careful out there.

Sunday, March 20, 2011

Coolsculpting by Zeltiq improves your Body Contour without Surgery

Here's an article from a news outlet in Hawaii about a young mother who successfully improved her abdominal contour via Coolsculpting in the office of a colleague.

At our Orlando area Plastic Surgery, Skin Care, and Hair Restoration Center, we are pleased to have been the first in Central Florida to offer this safe, effective, and easy treatment.


HONOLULU (HawaiiNewsNow) – In November Hawaii News Now was at Asia Pacific Plastic Surgery when a new mother from Mililani underwent "Coolsculpting" in hopes of losing the excess weight she gained on her stomach during pregnancy.
Three months later we went back to see if the treatment produced the results she wanted.
"I have a reduction now. It's not as pudgy. It's more flat," Liz Rashkin said as she showed off her new slimmer stomach.
Coolsculpting is a non-invasive body contouring procedure developed by Zeltiq. The device is applied to fat on either a patient's stomach or love handles. The fat is sucked into an applicator, and then cooled.
"What it's doing is it's cooling down an area of fat to temperatures very close to freezing without damaging the skin. When the fat is cooled down to that level the fat cells undergo a change over the course of about two or four months they slowly disappear," said Doctor Shim Ching.
Zeltiq claims a one hour treatment eliminates between 20% and 25% of fat in the treated area.
Rashkin is a believer.
"A lot of women have asked me about it, and you know, at first I'm not going to tell you anything until I see results. But (now) I would definitely recommend it to women to try," Rashkin said.
She said it has improved her figure and her confidence.
"It's that boost. I think it's an overall feeling you get about yourself. When you feel good you walk differently. You smile. It's just everything about you. You feel good," Rashkin said.
"Now I'm motivated to get even more weight off."

If you have questions about Coolsculpting, give us a call, or visit www.CoolsculptingOrlando.com to learn more


Monday, March 7, 2011

Survey of America's Most Experienced Plastic Surgeons Confirms Many Newer Liposuction Devices are Marketing Gimmicks

This piece, summarizing the findings of a recent peer-reviewed article in one of our specialty's major journals, makes all of the points I've been writing about for some time now... With regard to ANY new technology (especially where your safety and happiness may be at stake), the appropriate questions to ask before allowing it to be used on you are:

  • Is it BETTER than existing alternatives- that is, is it going to be more likely to help me and my surgeon achieve my goals?
  • Is it SAFER than existing alternatives?
  • Is it LESS EXPENSIVE than existing alternatives? Bear in mind that this is only important if the answers to the first two questions are "yes".
From The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery:

Survey Extracts Surgeons’ Preferences on Liposuction

Results published in the February Issue of the Aesthetic Surgery Journal

New York, NY (February 14, 2011)– 

With an array of new innovations in liposuction and other forms of fat removal, which do plastic surgeons prefer, and which do they perceive as the safest? 

To answer these questions, the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ASAPS) recently conducted a survey of its membership to uncover their experience with liposuction, new fat removal technologies and the management of complications.  

The survey revealed that suction-assisted lipectomy (SAL), or “traditional” liposuction, was the preferred method of fat removal for over half of respondents; power-assisted liposuction (PAL) and ultrasound-assisted liposuction (UAL) were also popular. Laser-assisted liposuction (LAL) and external noninvasive devices, such as external ultrasound and laser, were the least popular methods for fat removal.  The full results of the ASAPS Current Trends in Liposuction Survey have been published in the February issue of the Aesthetic Surgery Journal (ASJ).

“In a field that is so rapidly advancing, it is essential to continually evaluate new technologies and methods to ensure that we maintain the safety of our patients,” said Jamil Ahmad, MD, lead author of the survey, “Our survey found that ASAPS members tend to more frequently employ the fat removal methods that have the longest track records and the most data to support their efficacy and safety. In the future, we may notice preferences shift as we see additional prospective data comparing techniques, and as we gain more experience with newer methods. These factors will also help us continue to improve safety-related standards of care.”

The Aesthetic Society survey consisted of 17 questions pertaining to the application of liposuction and other fat removal techniques, management of complications, and experience with newer fat removal technologies. The survey was distributed via email to 1,713 ASAPS members, of whom 492 (28.7 percent) responded. Highlights of the survey include the following findings:
Most respondents perform between 51 and 100 liposuctions per year.
Most currently employ or have previous experience with SAL (92.7 percent), UAL (59.6 percent), and PAL (44.7 percent). Fewer have experience with LAL (12.8 percent), mesotherapy (5.7 percent), or noninvasive devices (12.8 percent).

The preferred method of fat removal from most to least popular was:
SAL (51.4 percent)
PAL (23.0 percent)
UAL (20.9 percent)
LAL (3.9 percent)
Noninvasive devices (0.8 percent)

Respondents felt that newer fat removal technologies including LAL and mesotherapy were associated with a disproportionately higher rate of complications compared with more established methods (ie., SAL, PAL, and UAL). (emphasis added)

Respondents felt that marketing (68.3 percent) was the most common reason that influenced patients to choose newer treatments such as LAL. (emphasis added)

Members support education of physicians with appropriate aesthetic surgery training and similar ethical practice but are concerned with industry marketing to physicians without appropriate aesthetic surgery training, practicing outside of their scope of practice. (for example, the Orlando area eye doctor who heavily markets Naturalfill and Aqualipo)
“Evaluating the opinions of our members is an excellent way to identify industry trends and determine how to improve the field for both surgeons and patients,” said Felmont Eaves III, MD, ASAPS president.   “It is important for us to conduct surveys such as these, not only regarding liposuction and other forms of fat removal, but for all facets of aesthetic surgery.”

Liposuction, also called lipoplasty, removes deposits of excess fat from specific areas of the body including the face and neck. It is the second most popular surgical cosmetic procedure in the U.S., with 283,735 liposuction surgeries performed in the U.S. in 2009, according to ASAPS.

About ASJ
The Aesthetic Surgery Journal is the peer-reviewed publication of the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ASAPS) and is the most widely read clinical journal in the field of cosmetic surgery, with subscribers in more than 60 countries.
About ASAPS
The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ASAPS), is recognized as the world’s leading organization devoted entirely to aesthetic plastic surgery and cosmetic medicine of the face and body.  ASAPS is comprised of over 2,600 Plastic Surgeons; active members are certified by the American Board of Plastic Surgery (USA) or by the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada and have extensive training in the complete spectrum of surgical and non-surgical aesthetic procedures. International active members are certified by equivalent boards of their respective countries. All members worldwide adhere to a strict Code of Ethics and must meet stringent membership requirements.


Visit Us:







Follow Us!


Sunday, February 13, 2011

British Woman Dies After Having Injections for Buttock Augmentation

I say and write it often- there are only 2 safe and effective ways to enhance your buttocks: buttock implants, and via the Brazilian Butt Lift technique. Anything else (no matter who is doing it for you, or how many friends you have who swear by it) is simply dangerous.

Of equal importance- if your goals are to be safe and happy with your outcome (duh!), be sure your surgery is performed by a surgeon certified by The American Board of Plastic Surgery. Think you can take this for granted? In Orlando alone, there are several ER doctors, a few gynecologists, and an eye doctor (!!) all marketing themselves to patients as liposuction experts.

Be careful folks.

Here's the link to the CNN story:

http://www.cnn.com/2011/CRIME/02/11/cosmetic.surgery.death/index.html?hpt=T2


Visit Us:







Follow Us!


Monday, January 24, 2011

The Truth About Awake and Office Plastic Surgery

This piece summarizes the significant concerns I have been writing about for some time. Until more patients speak out against these untrained and poorly trained physicians, the injuries and deaths will mount. The fact that these women are being injured during cosmetic surgery procedures is beside the point and we should all avoid passing judgment on them. Patients injured through the negligence and deliberate deception of eye doctors, gynecologists, and ER doctors selling themselves as cosmetic surgeons should be protected and these doctors punished.


Note that, like the doctors in Central Florida practicing outside their area of ACGME approved training, Dr. Bittner is trained in RADIOLOGY, and just like "Medspas" run by business people, they advertise their procedures as safer and more advanced because they are done in an office- but the reality is that they don't have a safe, accredited surgical facility available. Read on for a solid understanding.

(Reprinted from Self Magazine)

Paulette Hacker couldn’t stop screaming. Lying on her side on a gurney, wearing only a bra and panties, she felt as if she were being stabbed again and again. In a way, she was. Through incisions in her upper back, a stainless steel tube called a cannula was suctioning out her excess fat.

“Please stop! You’re hurting me!” she cried to her doctor. Because although Hacker’s body was limp and her mind bleary from an unknown combination of drugs she’d been given through pills and a gas mask, the 38-year-old was awake partway through the second day of liposuction on her back, underarms, abdomen, hips and neck. That was the whole point: She was undergoing the new and aggressively marketed Awake cosmetic surgery, which is performed under local anesthesia.

“You can’t scream, Paulette,” a gruff voice answered her. Hacker hazily realized that the voice did not belong to her doctor; the man performing her operation was a stranger whom Hacker would later discover was a physician’s assistant. According to Hacker, whose experience is also detailed in a Los Angeles Superior Court complaint, she could see people coming and going into the “operating room”—more like an oversize exam room—at the Rodeo Drive office of Craig Alan Bittner, M.D., a “liposculpture” practitioner in Los Angeles. (Through his attorney, Dr. Bittner strongly denies all of Hacker’s allegations.)

“Move her into the TV room—she’s making too much noise,” a confused and terrified Hacker heard another voice say. Her gurney was rolled down the hall and into a second room, where she could see the assistant jab her while he watched a basketball game playing in the background on a wall-mounted television. The volume was cranked up loud enough to drown out her cries.


After the five-hour operation, Hacker says the assistant and an office clerk yanked her to her feet and squeezed her into compression garments. Dazed and sobbing, she struggled into her clothes and found herself face-to-face with a beaming Dr. Bittner. The doctor gently asked why she was crying, she says. Then he maneuvered her beside him and told her to smile for a photo...

Hacker had been excited to fly down two days earlier from Sacramento, California. The stay-at-home mom weighed 233 pounds and was trying to slim down; she’d lost 22 pounds on her own through diet and exercise—mostly jogging—and now felt she could use some help. But she’d never had elective surgery before and feared having general anesthesia.

Surfing the Web, Hacker had discovered the Awake procedure, which was advertised as a cheaper and more medically advanced alternative to lipo—and, for those inclined, to abdominoplasty and breast enhancement, too.

The price was right: Awake lipo with Dr. Bittner would cost only about $700 for each body part, versus about $3,000 if she had regular plastic surgery. She found it comforting that the lipo would be performed in a doctor’s cozy office, not in an intimidating outpatient surgical center or hospital. Best of all to Hacker, Awake ads promised that patients would remain lucid throughout the operation and even be able to interact with their doctor. “I liked the idea that I’d be awake and in control,” Hacker remembers. “The surgery really looked like it was for me.”

Unfortunately, the procedure may not have been designed to meet her needs, but rather the doctors’.

“The reason for the ‘awake’ portion of it has nothing to do with improving patient comfort,” says Joseph M. Gryskiewicz, M.D., of Minneapolis, chair of the emerging-trends committee of the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ASAPS). “It has to do with doctors not needing to involve an anesthesiologist.” General anesthesia is expensive, and the specialists who provide it prefer to work in hospitals or clinics that have met high safety standards. 


Awake surgery has become a way for doctors who lack hospital privileges—but who want to cash in on the plastic surgery market—to exploit a loophole by performing the operations in the privacy of their offices. “This is just a gimmick by people who can’t operate their way out of a wet paper bag,” Dr. Gryskiewicz argues.


Hacker had chosen Dr. Bittner’s medi-spa after studying his website, which showcased his Johns Hopkins education, testimonials and pictures of smiling patients beside the tall, tan doctor. Hacker checked to make sure Dr. Bittner was qualified, and there it was: “board-certified.” She didn’t realize that he was a board-certified radiologist.

A non-plastic-surgery background is the norm for Awake practitioners, who tend to be family physicians, OBs, ophthalmologists, pathologists—any doctor willing to shell out up to $7,000 for two-day training courses held around 30 times a year by a group of recently formed professional associations.

It’s all emblematic of a growing problem of amateurism in the plastic surgery field, warns Michael F. McGuire, M.D., a director of the American Board of Plastic Surgery, the group that certifies plastic surgeons. In Southern California, 40 percent of liposuction practitioners had no training in the procedure before entering practice, according to a 2010 study in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery by surgeons at Loma Linda University Medical Center in California. The study found that the most numerous providers of lipo after plastic surgeons were otolaryngologists—ear, nose and throat doctors. And a 2008 review of liposuction-related fatalities in Germany concluded that in cases in which patients died, “lack of surgical experience was a notorious contributing factor,” especially when it came to doctors’ failing to identify complications.

Breast augmentation takes that risk to an even higher level, Dr. McGuire says, because of the host of emergencies that could arise, including blocked airways, blood pressure changes or collapsed lungs. And full tummy tucks are the most invasive of all, risking pulmonary embolism and abdominal perforation; Dr. McGuire calls it “inconceivable that anyone would do such a major procedure under anything less than a light general anesthesia.” He cites Awake surgery as part of a disturbing trend of non–plastic surgeons attempting procedures that have not been thoroughly tested—such as the not-yet-FDA-approved “stem cell face-lift,” and Macrolane injectable breast enhancement—and unabashedly touting them to the public as the Next Big Thing. “Awake surgery is a carnival sideshow event,” Dr. McGuire says. “Your life could be at stake with some of these kooks.”

An Awake breast-implant surgery in the Plano, Texas, office of Jeffrey C. Caruth, M.D., often starts with a small dose of 5 or 10 milligrams of Valium, to relax the patient. “If they take too much sedative, they’re going to have trouble picking out a size,” says Dr. Caruth, a board-certified ob/gyn who has performed more than 200 Awake breast jobs since his training course in May 2008 (as well as 1,000 Awake liposuctions, charging up to $5,000 per surgery). Using a thin needle, Dr. Caruth injects each breast with a small amount of the anesthetic fluid lidocaine. When the area numbs, he makes his first incision. There’s no anesthesiologist and, unlike with IV-administered “twilight sedation,” no drip that can be adjusted to render a patient unconscious if she’s in pain.

“They’re totally alert,” Dr. Caruth says. “It’s actually a lot of fun; we play music and talk.” He says his patients feel nothing as he uses a cannula to infiltrate both breasts with tumescent fluid—a solution of saline, lidocaine and epinephrine—and makes more incisions. Next, they feel pressure and pulling as he stretches the skin and muscle to create a pocket under the muscle large enough for the implants. Then comes the climactic moment: The patient’s gurney is ratcheted upright so she can face a mirror and see her chest inflated with temporary sizers. The doctor ushers in her partner, family or friends to help her decide if she’s happy with her new silhouette before proceeding with the implants.

This is the driving reason women choose Awake breast surgery, according to Dr. Caruth. “They want to have input. When you go shopping, you don’t take something off the rack, throw it in the sack and go home. You try it on first,” he points out. “Women are picky. It’s like shopping for a new dress or a pair of shoes.” He consults with patients before surgery about what’s feasible, but the ultimate decision comes while they’re under the knife.

A patient’s autonomy—her ability to exert control over her own body—is a huge selling point, emphasized again and again on the websites of Awake practitioners. But the idea of asserting your rights on the operating room table is misguided at best, says Diana Zuckerman, Ph.D., president of the National Research Center for Women & Families. “A woman lying there is not in any position to be giving advice to the surgeon,” she exclaims. “To make it sound like empowerment? The mind reels.”


For one thing, when a patient is sedated with Valium or Percocet, her judgment is clouded, making her more prone to irrational decisions or to being overly influenced by the onlookers, says Herluf Lund, M.D., a plastic surgeon in St. Louis who has researched the safety and design of breast implants. Dr. Lund watched a video of an Awake breast surgery at an ASAPS conference—and says the roomful of doctors was aghast. “The patient looked as if she’d had about 10 stiff margaritas” as she contemplated her reflection and—at her doctor’s urging—agreed to go up a size, he recounts.

Dr. Caruth says his patients are completely lucid because of his insistence upon minimal sedation—about half of his patients take no Valium at all—and that he’s had only two patients who wanted do-overs, both to go bigger. “I know people who say they do Awake breast augmentation and then slam the patient with narcotics,” he says. “That’s not the case here.” But even among patients who aren’t sedated, the time to make reasoned decisions is before surgery, Dr. Lund argues. The operating room is not a shopping mall, after all; if you regret your impulse purchase, you can’t easily go back and return it. “In the consultation room, the C-cup might have made more sense for your body and your life, but in the operating room, you might say, ‘Give me the D!’” Dr. Lund says, adding, “Later, if you’re not happy, the doctor can say, ‘Well, I gave you what you wanted.’”

Another Awake premise is that patients are smart to avoid general anesthesia, which causes one death per 200,000 to 300,000 anesthetics given, the Institute of Medicine estimated in 2000. But the large volume of lidocaine used during an Awake surgery poses its own risks. “The amount of local anesthesia needed to anesthetize both breasts comes close to the toxic level,” says Dr. McGuire, who is also immediate past president of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS). Lidocaine has not been extensively studied for breast augmentation, but plastic surgeons say a limit of 35 mg to 50 mg per kilo is wise. Dr. Caruth says he uses about half this amount. But in reviewing more than a dozen cases of Awake surgery gone wrong, Dr. McGuire says patients got more than the limit—and warns that a lidocaine overdose can kill.

The idea is that a high dose is safe in Awake surgery because it’s injected into fat, which, having fewer blood vessels than muscle does, is slower to absorb anesthetic. On the other hand, “that slow absorption could mean you’re just delaying peak toxicity,” says Keith J. Ruskin, M.D., professor of anesthesiology at the Yale University School of Medicine. “So theoretically, you could have someone on her way home from surgery, and complications like seizures and heart arrhythmias could arise.”

Without an anesthesiologist present, patients can also end up in agony. Dr. Caruth says he’s able to resolve discomfort with an extra squirt of tumescent fluid. But “you don’t want people with a low threshold for pain,” he adds. If a patient remains uncomfortable after a doctor has already maxed her out on lidocaine, an Awake practitioner is left with only two options: Halt the surgery, or grimace and carry on. Responsible doctors would do the former; Dr. Caruth says he’s only once had to cut a surgery short. But not all surgeons act responsibly, Dr. McGuire says, and if patients were to writhe in pain at the wrong time, it could spell disaster. “The stories are just hair-raising,” he says. “As a surgeon, I don’t want to be operating on screaming people.”

Awake doctors aren't trained in plastic surgery 


After her painful procedures, Hacker returned home bandaged, swollen and sore. “I hurt so much, I couldn’t function,” she says. Her entire body swelled out of control despite her wearing a pressurized garment for eight weeks, and she had neck and back pain so wrenching that she couldn’t lift her young daughter for the next year and a half.

The more facts Hacker learned about her physician, the more disturbed she became. Three other patients had come forward, alleging their Awake liposuction was performed not by Dr. Bittner but by his office manager—a woman with no medical license who was also his girlfriend—and that they emerged injured and disfigured. Those suits were settled or withdrawn. But Dr. Bittner still faces a felony charge for aiding and abetting the practice of medicine without certification, as well as a civil suit brought by Hacker. His lawyer, Benjamin Gluck of Los Angeles, notes that his client has “hundreds and hundreds of satisfied patients” versus “a few unhappy patients who have retracted their more colorful accusations under oath.” Given this, Gluck says he strongly believes the criminal case will resolve in the doctor’s favor.

Hacker also discovered that no doctor should have given her lipo in the first place. It is inappropriate for obese patients because of their higher risk for complications and because surgeons can safely remove only about 5 pounds of fat, Dr. McGuire says. Worse, experts say, doing multiple sessions of lipo on many body parts over sequential days—common among Awake surgeons—is far outside the norm and vastly increases the dangers. When she shared post-op reports from Dr. Bittner’s office with another physician, Hacker learned her blood pressure went so high during the procedure she could have had a stroke. “This was all about greed, not about taking care of patients,” she says.

The main organization pushing the Awake-training gold rush is the American Academy of Cosmetic Gynecologists in Tucson, Arizona—a group with an official-sounding title, but one that is actually open to any ob-gyn willing to pay $300 in dues. Founded seven years ago, the “academy” quickly attracted so many other specialists clamoring to join that other organizations sprouted up to accommodate them—the National Society of Cosmetic Physicians, which now boasts 1,200 members, as well as the American Academy of Cosmetic Family Medicine and the American Academy of Cosmetic Dermatologists. A fifth group, the National Society of Cosmetic Plastic Surgeons, contradicts its name by asking only that applicants be practicing “physicians,” not plastic surgeons. (In contrast, doctors hoping to join more prestigious, long-standing societies like the ASPS and the ASAPS must be board-certified in plastic surgery, engage in continuing education and be sponsored by current members.)

In a surprise twist, reporting revealed that despite their various names, all five Awake groups seem to be the same organization, listed at the same Tucson address, sharing phone numbers and faculty. An employee who answered the phone refused to reveal the groups’ leadership, saying only that the director’s name was “Brad” and that the groups declined to comment.

The linked organizations offer two-day courses in Awake liposuction ($5,000), tummy tucks ($7,000) and breast augmentation ($7,000). Among the instructors is Anil Gandhi, M.D., a general surgeon in Cerritos, California, who is not board-certified in any field. Dr. Gandhi’s workshop—which includes lectures on start-up costs, promotional materials and handling the dissatisfied patient—is complete after 22 hours. It takes more than five years in a residency program to train surgeons to do breast augmentation.

The threat to patients is not theoretical: After a 37-year-old Florida woman went into shock and died after undergoing lipo with a doctor trained only by short courses designed for gynecologists, the state board of medicine found that “these courses do not provide adequate training to develop the proper surgical judgment” on who is a good candidate, what form of anesthesia is safest for her and how to avoid and react to complications.

Many surgeries done in unsafe facilities 


Not only do Awake practitioners work outside their area of expertise, but many operate in facilities with few safety standards. Most facilities outfitted for moderate anesthesia and up are accredited by one of the major nonprofit organizations that oversees safety and doctor training. But because Awake practitioners use only local anesthesia, they often skip accreditation, too. “Do they know anything about sterility, about occupational health and safety standards, about infection control?” asks Lawrence S. Reed, M.D., immediate past president of the American Association for Accreditation of Ambulatory Surgery Facilities in Gurnee, Illinois. “Because they’re not accredited, there’s no way of knowing what goes on in their offices.”

Unless, of course, something goes wrong—as happened in the office of Sean Su, M.D. Trained as a family physician, Dr. Su opened a clinic in Las Vegas called the Skin + Body Institute and advertised a “Makeover Wish” contest, the winner of which would get free Awake implants and then shill for his website. The prize went to a 29-year-old who explained in an entry essay that she suffered from low self-esteem, partly due to marital problems.

State authorities would soon come to call her Patient A. During her surgery in April 2009, Patient A experienced “significant pain and anxiety” for eight grueling hours, according to the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners, which investigated her complaint. She was slow to heal—and seven weeks after surgery, her right implant started to pop out of its incision, says Douglas Cooper, executive director of the board. Dr. Su then performed yet another painful eight-hour Awake surgery, during which he washed the infected breast pocket, then returned the implant to her chest—right along with any bacteria that might have been left clinging to the implant.

Little surprise, then, that Patient A was admitted two weeks later to Sunrise Hospital for emergency surgery for a breast infection. As the surgeons removed her implants, they were shocked by what they saw. According to the investigators’ preliminary findings, Dr. Su had created a pocket too small for the implant. His incisions were “jagged and uneven” and three times longer than appropriate. And he’d left behind an “inexplicable mass of sutures” along the tissue of her right chest wall, increasing the odds for infection.

The board also discovered a second patient of Dr. Su’s with a similar complaint: a 25-year-old who’d also undergone an eight-hour Awake breast surgery, followed by serious infection. Investigators found an unsterile clinic with a canister of days-old liposuction waste left in a procedure room and expired tools and medications, including the lidocaine used for Awake procedures.

In March 2010, the board of medical examiners found Dr. Su guilty of malpractice, keeping inaccurate records and trying to deceive board staff. Yet his penalty didn’t seem that bad. He had to reimburse the cost of his $25,000 investigation, pay a $4,500 fine and serve out 18 months’ probation, during which he is barred from practicing or supervising cosmetic procedures. He is free to once again do family medicine and told self in an email that he has fixed the conditions in his office and, when his probation ends, he plans to restart his aesthetic practice, too: “I had no other alternative but to accept their agreement due to lack of finances for a prolonged defense with a biased medical board” driven by “antiquated physicians not up-to-date with knowledge in the advancement of safer treatments.” There is a tendency for plastic surgeons to “protect their turf from outsiders,” Dr. Su added. “As always will be the case, such pioneering physicians as myself will be criticized when known complications occur and will thus be judged harshly and unfairly.”

A few state medical boards have become concerned enough to try to stem the tide of doctors’ “scope drift” into cosmetic surgery. After three liposuction patients died in the care of an internist in Anthem, Arizona, that state’s board was the first to draft guidelines reminding doctors that, upon expanding their practices into new areas, they need to be competent in those areas, says the board’s executive director, Lisa Wynn.

In North Carolina, the medical board suspended indefinitely the license of an ear, nose and throat doctor who did a series of substandard plastic procedures and is finalizing a policy that could result in discipline for doctors who venture too far from their expertise. Previously, a rash of liposuction deaths in Florida led to more stringent rules for office surgery. These rules make a small step in the right direction but still rely heavily on doctors’ willingness to adhere to the honor code. With little oversight, “it’s a buyer-beware situation,” Dr. McGuire says.


Just ask Paulette Hacker, who hasn’t been the same since her Awake lipo. Her “bargain” surgery ended up costing $6,000 worth of chiropractors and hyperbaric oxygen treatments to ease her pain. And she estimates she’ll spend thousands more to correct the aesthetic damage—because whenever she looks in the mirror, she’s reminded of her Awake mistake.

She’s been left with a lumpy back, a misshapen belly, uneven hips, a neck striated with scar tissue, an asymmetrical jawline and a conga line of polka-dot scars down her sides. “I thought I was an educated consumer, an intelligent person,” Hacker says. “I wish I had known: If they’re not properly trained and certified as a plastic surgeon, they have no business cutting through your skin. If something seems too good to be true, then it is.”




-- I couldn't agree more... and here's the thing- if you think this couldn't happen to you, you should think again- in Central Florida (and just off the top of my head), there are several doctors practicing outside their ACGME accredited training- an eye doctor named Roger Bassin, several gynecologists, and an ER doctor.

Remember that all surgery involves risks- you are best served by minimizing those risks- choose only someone with appropriate and legitimate training to do your procedure.


Visit Us:







Follow Us!


Sunday, January 23, 2011

The $6 Haircut

Some time ago, there was a television commercial for one of the larger office supply chains in which the proprietor of a small barbershop experiences what he perceives to be a threat to his business while sweeping the sidewalk outside his shop...

A large, national chain opens across the street to much fanfare and with a large banner that reads something like, "Home of the $6 Haircut"

The narrator explains that with the money he saves by purchasing office supplies at GigantoOffice, he is able to address the threat- and the spot shows him hanging his own banner- that reads, "We Fix $6 Haircuts"

(BTW,  I agree it is a bit funny that the ad was for a large, national chain of discount office supply stores...)

Soon, the large chain store is closing and he is victorious....

Cute- but what if the damage done by the discounter of services was not to your hair (which, of course grows back), but to another part of your body- and what if that damage required another operation to fix... or worse, couldn't be fixed. What if your visit to the discount provider of services resulted in your death?

The unfortunate reality is that there are at present a very large number of "providers" of aesthetic surgery who (in my humble opinion) have placed their financial well-being above the oaths they (and all doctors) took to protect patients and "First Do No Harm".

Among them are gynecologists, ER doctors, and even eye doctors- all advertising themselves as expert cosmetic surgeons- despite their full understanding of their lack of ACGME (American Council on Graduate Medical Education- the body that certifies training programs for specialities in medicine) training in the surgical discipline they are engaging in. Indeed, in most cases, their "training" consisted of a few hours, days, or at best weeks of watching someone from the company selling the equipment to them do the procedure.

Whether you were aware of it at the time or not, you've been exposed to them... They are the ones telling you that having liposuction in their office under local anesthesia is the safer way to go. That general anesthesia (as the plastic surgeon you saw recommended) is much more dangerous... That if they are capable of doing delicate eye surgery, they should be more than capable of liposuction. 

Imagine me telling patients that because I am trained to do delicate plastic surgery, I should be more than able to do their heart surgery.... Hard to imagine? It's happening all around you in the field of aesthetic surgery.

But the fundamental truth is that these doctors are not appropriately trained to do these procedures- fully explaining the deaths we all are reading about.

Previously healthy young women dying during procedures that should not have much risk of death. Dying because they chose poorly and prioritized their financial outlay higher than their safety or happiness. Dying because they fell victim to aggressive marketing campaigns designed to confuse you into thinking the eye doctor in the ad is a plastic surgeon. Dying because they believed the marketing pitch that local anesthesia is "much safer"- when the truth is that for procedures involving larger areas of the body local anesthesia is much LESS safe.

I see a great many women who have been injured and disfigured by these providers of discount or just poor quality services (indeed, an eye doctor in town actually charges MORE than any of the reputable and well trained plastic surgeons I know for liposuction). In some cases, I find myself telling them I can fix their "$6 haircut"- through another operation and at added expense to them of course. In others, I can only mitigate the damage.

And some, like the sister of Michelle Boone, my nurse practitioner, are never able to get this education about the providers of aesthetic surgery without adequate training. Because one of them took her life.

Be careful.

Plastic surgery can be a beautiful thing- restoring an appearance you thought was lost forever or not possible for you. But we should all insist that it also be as safe as possible and that the experience be positive. Be your own best advocate. Do your homework and place your safety and happiness only in the hands of a surgeon Certified by The American Board of Plastic Surgery with a track record of safety, success, and integrity.


Visit Us:







Follow Us!


Wednesday, January 5, 2011

Another woman dies having liposuction and fat transfer in Florida


Yet another tragic reminder of how many poorly trained "providers" are performing these surgical procedures on unsuspecting patients....

In Orlando alone there are several ER doctors, a few gynecologists, and an eye doctor (!) all saying they are experts in liposuction and fat transfer. The eye doctor (Dr. Roger Bassin) has advertisements claiming expertise in fat transfer to the breast... I'm not sure how much training in breast surgery the average eye doctor receives... Hmm...

PLEASE be careful- find a surgeon certified by The American Board of Plastic Surgery, who will do your surgery in an accredited facility, with a qualified anesthesia provider. Doing so is the ONLY way to maximize your chances of being safe and happy!


Visit Us:







Follow Us!