Showing posts with label Orlando Aqualipo. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Orlando Aqualipo. Show all posts

Monday, August 15, 2011

Dr. Armando Soto on Fox's Good Day Orlando!

I wanted to recap for readers the essentials of my discussion with Michelle of Fox 35 Orlando this morning, as well as elaborate on the important things to know and ask before allowing anyone to do any kind of elective plastic surgery procedure on you.

This discussion was of course brought about by the recent events in the Phoenix area, where a local ER doctor was accused, indicted, and then convicted of second degree murder and manslaughter after 3 of his patients died while undergoing (or shortly thereafter) liposuction.

The case is noteworthy not just because of the fact that 3 human beings unfortunately lost their lives during procedures that should have been very safe for healthy people like them, but because the doctor was found guilty of MURDER, and not just of malpractice.

To review, the prosecutors successfully argued that as Dr. Peter Normann was intelligent enough to complete medical school and training in Emergency Medicine, he should also have been intelligent enough to understand that his complete lack of legitimate training in plastic surgery and liposuction (he took a weekend course) constituted an untoward risk for his patients. In other words, Duh! You're an ER doctor- probably shouldn't be doing liposuction on people.

Furthermore, they reasoned that he should also have had the wherewithal to know that his advertising a level of expertise in these procedures that he clearly did not have, along with his lack of training, and the fact that he performed the procedures in a facility without appropriate accreditation was fundamentally wrong...

Therefore, they concluded that he clearly showed more regard for his income than for his patient's safety, and displayed what they (the prosecutors) called an "extreme indifference" to human life, which met the guidelines for murder in the second degree.

Scary.

So- what should we all take away from this?

Well first of all, as a plastic surgeon, clearly it would be wrong for me to offer to do heart surgery on a patient- as cool as it would be to be able to say I do heart surgery AND plastic surgery, I know it would be wrong.

The amazing thing is that it would NOT be illegal.... At least not if I could talk someone into letting me do it on them in my office under local anesthesia.

And that's a big part of how so many unfortunate patients wind up injured or dead after cosmetic surgery.

Historically, what kept doctors "honest" and prevented them from trying to do procedures on people that they were incompetent to perform, was the hospital credentialing system.

We'll use myself as an example... If I (as a trained Plastic Surgeon certified by The American Board of Plastic Surgery) wanted to obtain privileges at a hospital for the performance of liposuction, I would need to submit a great deal of paperwork to the hospital's Credentialing Committee proving that I had received legitimate, ACGME approved training in plastic surgery and liposuction.

The ACGME, or Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, is the body that judges whether residency training a doctor receives is adequate and appropriate before letting them say they are trained in the discipline. From their website:
    
  • The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education is a private, nonprofit council that evaluates and accredits medical residency programs in the United States.

  • The ACGME was established in 1981 from a consensus in the academic medical community for an independent accrediting organization. Its forerunner was the Liaison Committee for Graduate Medical Education, established in 1972.

  • The mission of the ACGME is to improve health care by assessing and advancing the quality of resident physicians’ education through exemplary accreditation. 

If I, on the other hand, asked for privileges performing heart surgery in the same hospital, my request would be quickly denied (and I would probably even be denied privileges in procedures I can prove competence in- just for asking to do something so far outside my area of training) because I would be unable to provide proof of ACGME accredited training in this discipline.

But here's the thing.... What if I could convince people to let me try doing heart surgery on them in my office under local anesthesia? 

By avoiding the hospital, I've also avoided the Credentialing Committee. 

And there is no law to stop me from doing whatever I want to patients in my office, as long as I have their (the patient's) permission to do it. 

It's true- if you were dumb enough to let me charm you into having heart surgery under local anesthesia in my office, I could legally do it. The outcome may not be so good, but I could do it.

And that's why I always tell people that if you could only ask your provider one question, the most important one would be, "Do you have privileges to perform the operation you are proposing for me in a hospital?" (but don't take their word for it- call the hospital and check).

Now heart surgery in an office setting is so obviously ridiculous that there are probably very few people alive who would consent to it (although someone probably would).

But what about if we were talking about liposuction? How hard would it be to distract you from the fact that I might not have the proper training in the procedure and fool you into letting me do it on you?

What if I were able to convince you that the machine I use in my office makes it so easy that you're not really having surgery at all, but rather a "minimally invasive" fat removal? 

What if I convinced you that I'm the only one in town who knows how to do it- by giving my procedure a cute name? 

What if I (fraudulently) advertised that my procedure was fundamentally different and better than liposuction, and that there was minimal or no downtime? 

What if I (falsely) told you that having it done under local anesthesia was "safer" because you don't need general anesthesia? 

Now it's not so hard to understand how otherwise intelligent people might put their happiness and safety in the wrong hands, is it?

And believe it or not, there are ER doctors, gynecologists, and an eye doctor here in Central Florida making all of these claims.

So let's all realize the following:
  1. All liposuction is surgery. It doesn't matter what machine is being used, or how you're anesthetized. If someone is removing fat from your body through an incision, however small, you're having surgery.

  2. All surgery has risks (just ask the families of the 3 patients who died in Dr. Normann's OR)

  3. You can minimize your risks by choosing the right surgeon, the right facility, and the right anesthesia provider- and all 3 are important.

  4. Conversely, your risks of a bad outcome are much greater if you let yourself be fooled into having plastic surgery performed by someone who does not have legitimate, ACGME training in plastic surgery.

And with regard to the last point- make no mistake about it, Dr. Normann was not an isolated numbskull. Every large community in America now has ER doctors, gynecologists, family doctors, and even an eye doctor (here in Orlando) calling themselves liposuction experts, despite a lack of ACGME accredited training in the procedure.

How do you protect yourself and those you love? 
  • Do as much research as you can

    • Research the surgeon

      • What was his training in?

      • Is he Board Certified- and just as important- by WHICH BOARD?

      • Where was his training?

    • Research the facility in which the procedure is to be performed

      • Is it accredited? Ask to see the certificate

      • By whom? Make sure the facility is accredited by The AAAASF or JCAHO

    • Research the anesthesia provider

      • Who is taking care of you while you are having surgery is just as important as who is doing the surgery!

      • Is it an anesthesiologist (a doctor of anesthesia)?  PREFERRED

      • A certified nurse anesthetist? LESS IDEAL

      • The surgeon himself or a nurse??  BE VERY CONCERNED


Finally, where can you look for these important answers?  Here you go...
  1. Check the website for the State Medical Board in the state in which you live. You can learn about the doctor's training (or lack thereof) and much more. For Florida, the link is:  http://ww2.doh.state.fl.us/IRM00profiling/searchform.asp

  2. You can also check reputable doctor review sites. The word reputable is critical here... more on that later. The very best is www.RealSelf.com

    1. What makes it the best? Quite simply:

    2. It is complete- there is a wealth of information about doctors, their training, and their outcomes

    3. It is fair- Realself balances doctor's legitimate concerns against patient's in the most fair fashion of the sites out there right now. As I will write about in the near future, there is no perfect site, but this is as good as there is at the present time.

    4. Realself requires doctors market honestly, and only in the specialty in which they actually are trained. Critical.

And finally, if you are still uncertain about a doctor you have seen, email me and I can help you figure out what their training was all about- 

And for those cynics out there-- this is not about me feeling competitive. As long as you are in the hands of a Board Certified Plastic Surgeon, I'm good. 

It's the damage done to the reputation of ALL plastic surgeons and plastic surgery itself by injuries and deaths caused by non-plastic surgeons that I'm trying to prevent here.

Monday, March 7, 2011

Survey of America's Most Experienced Plastic Surgeons Confirms Many Newer Liposuction Devices are Marketing Gimmicks

This piece, summarizing the findings of a recent peer-reviewed article in one of our specialty's major journals, makes all of the points I've been writing about for some time now... With regard to ANY new technology (especially where your safety and happiness may be at stake), the appropriate questions to ask before allowing it to be used on you are:

  • Is it BETTER than existing alternatives- that is, is it going to be more likely to help me and my surgeon achieve my goals?
  • Is it SAFER than existing alternatives?
  • Is it LESS EXPENSIVE than existing alternatives? Bear in mind that this is only important if the answers to the first two questions are "yes".
From The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery:

Survey Extracts Surgeons’ Preferences on Liposuction

Results published in the February Issue of the Aesthetic Surgery Journal

New York, NY (February 14, 2011)– 

With an array of new innovations in liposuction and other forms of fat removal, which do plastic surgeons prefer, and which do they perceive as the safest? 

To answer these questions, the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ASAPS) recently conducted a survey of its membership to uncover their experience with liposuction, new fat removal technologies and the management of complications.  

The survey revealed that suction-assisted lipectomy (SAL), or “traditional” liposuction, was the preferred method of fat removal for over half of respondents; power-assisted liposuction (PAL) and ultrasound-assisted liposuction (UAL) were also popular. Laser-assisted liposuction (LAL) and external noninvasive devices, such as external ultrasound and laser, were the least popular methods for fat removal.  The full results of the ASAPS Current Trends in Liposuction Survey have been published in the February issue of the Aesthetic Surgery Journal (ASJ).

“In a field that is so rapidly advancing, it is essential to continually evaluate new technologies and methods to ensure that we maintain the safety of our patients,” said Jamil Ahmad, MD, lead author of the survey, “Our survey found that ASAPS members tend to more frequently employ the fat removal methods that have the longest track records and the most data to support their efficacy and safety. In the future, we may notice preferences shift as we see additional prospective data comparing techniques, and as we gain more experience with newer methods. These factors will also help us continue to improve safety-related standards of care.”

The Aesthetic Society survey consisted of 17 questions pertaining to the application of liposuction and other fat removal techniques, management of complications, and experience with newer fat removal technologies. The survey was distributed via email to 1,713 ASAPS members, of whom 492 (28.7 percent) responded. Highlights of the survey include the following findings:
Most respondents perform between 51 and 100 liposuctions per year.
Most currently employ or have previous experience with SAL (92.7 percent), UAL (59.6 percent), and PAL (44.7 percent). Fewer have experience with LAL (12.8 percent), mesotherapy (5.7 percent), or noninvasive devices (12.8 percent).

The preferred method of fat removal from most to least popular was:
SAL (51.4 percent)
PAL (23.0 percent)
UAL (20.9 percent)
LAL (3.9 percent)
Noninvasive devices (0.8 percent)

Respondents felt that newer fat removal technologies including LAL and mesotherapy were associated with a disproportionately higher rate of complications compared with more established methods (ie., SAL, PAL, and UAL). (emphasis added)

Respondents felt that marketing (68.3 percent) was the most common reason that influenced patients to choose newer treatments such as LAL. (emphasis added)

Members support education of physicians with appropriate aesthetic surgery training and similar ethical practice but are concerned with industry marketing to physicians without appropriate aesthetic surgery training, practicing outside of their scope of practice. (for example, the Orlando area eye doctor who heavily markets Naturalfill and Aqualipo)
“Evaluating the opinions of our members is an excellent way to identify industry trends and determine how to improve the field for both surgeons and patients,” said Felmont Eaves III, MD, ASAPS president.   “It is important for us to conduct surveys such as these, not only regarding liposuction and other forms of fat removal, but for all facets of aesthetic surgery.”

Liposuction, also called lipoplasty, removes deposits of excess fat from specific areas of the body including the face and neck. It is the second most popular surgical cosmetic procedure in the U.S., with 283,735 liposuction surgeries performed in the U.S. in 2009, according to ASAPS.

About ASJ
The Aesthetic Surgery Journal is the peer-reviewed publication of the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ASAPS) and is the most widely read clinical journal in the field of cosmetic surgery, with subscribers in more than 60 countries.
About ASAPS
The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ASAPS), is recognized as the world’s leading organization devoted entirely to aesthetic plastic surgery and cosmetic medicine of the face and body.  ASAPS is comprised of over 2,600 Plastic Surgeons; active members are certified by the American Board of Plastic Surgery (USA) or by the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada and have extensive training in the complete spectrum of surgical and non-surgical aesthetic procedures. International active members are certified by equivalent boards of their respective countries. All members worldwide adhere to a strict Code of Ethics and must meet stringent membership requirements.


Visit Us:







Follow Us!


Tuesday, May 11, 2010

The One Question That Could Save Your Life Before Cosmetic Surgery

While the title of this post may seem a bit dramatic, the fact is that more than a few American women have died (this year alone) during or after cosmetic surgery procedures, and that in every case that I know of, the procedure was being performed by a poorly trained doctor who's training was in something other than plastic surgery. 

Further, in every case I know of, the cause of death was something that was completely preventable had the patient been under the care of a surgeon Certified by The American Board of Plastic Surgery.

For every woman who's life was taken by her poor decisions, there are many more who are alive but deformed because they allowed a poorly trained person to do a cosmetic procedure on them.

In my Orlando Plastic Surgery and Skin Care Center, I see at least a few women a month who had Smart Lipo or "Aqua" Lipo performed by a local eye doctor (!) who advertises himself as a liposuction expert, and now have permanent disfigurement... (make no mistake- liposuction of any kind IS surgery)

In some cases, I am able to reconstruct a pleasing appearance (but only after more surgery that the patient wasn't planning)... in others, we are only able to camouflage the deformity that resulted from their poor decision to allow him to do surgery on them.

I am frequently asked-  how is a patient to know that a doctor's claims of expertise are marketing hoopla and not based on legitimate training and certification?

The simplest way is to ask if the doctor has privileges to do the operation they are proposing for you in a hospital.

In order to obtain hospital privileges for a procedure, a doctor must prove legitimate and specific training in the field in which he or she wishes to practice.

In other words, a hospital would not allow a person who's training was in ophthalmology to perform liposuction within its walls, because the people who run the hospital know that eye doctors don't get training in liposuction.

By doing these procedures in their offices, untrained or inadequately trained doctors are able to side-step the credentialing process- the proximate cause of the death and deformity to which I refer above.

Don't take chances with your life or your happiness- ask your doctor if they have privileges to do the procedure they are offering you in a hospital- then call the hospital and verify. It takes a few minutes, and could make all the difference in the world.


Visit Us:







Follow Us!


Sunday, February 21, 2010

All Hail the Body Jet! The latest in a long line of over-promising, under-delivering liposuction devices

Because I have been fielding a lot of questions about the Body Jet at my Orlando Plastic Surgery and Skin Care Center lately, I thought I would post my opinion of this "amazing new technology" (sarcasm intended).

Interestingly, the primary reason so many people are asking me about it is because of an Orlando EYE DOCTOR who advertises himself aggressively as a liposuction expert. Hmmm...

It is very interesting to me that this particular eye doctor is now touting the Body Jet as the next revolution in body contouring, because it was only a few months ago that he was still claiming Smart Lipo was the answer to all of our prayers.

I wonder if the very large number of women my colleagues and I have seen with poor outcomes caused by his so called liposuction expertise and their low opinions of him had anything to do with his jumping onto a new bandwagon... I'm not otherwise sure why someone so convinced that Smart lipo would change the world just a few months ago is now touting something else.

Regular readers will know that my favorite advice to patients is that if someone is offering to do liposuction on you, and you notice that they are spending a lot of time telling you about their fancy new machine, and use a lot of hyperbole explaining its benefits, and NO time explaining their training in plastic surgery, you should leave their office immediately.

The Body Jet (like Smart lipo before it) is a gimmicky new device being used by unscrupulous eye doctors, gynecologists, and other non-plastic surgeons to attract patients and draw media attention. 

They are largely successful in doing so because many people, and almost all of the media seem more interested in "New" than in "Safe" or "Better".

These unscrupulous  non-plastic surgeons hope to distract otherwise smart people from the fact that they did not complete residency training in plastic surgery or liposuction by making you think that the machine is more important than who is using it on you.

Beware snake oil salesmen. There are now many of them offering liposuction.

I do not know a SINGLE plastic surgeon certified by The American Board of Plastic Surgery who believes in, or uses this device.

When liposuction was first described and then refined, there was a reason that saline solution was used to wet the tissues before suctioning the fat. The body is mostly saline solution, and this is more physiologic than using water. Using water is actually a knuckle-headed step back in the refinement of this procedure!

Indeed, with administration of larger volumes of water under the skin, I would be concerned that electrolyte disturbances may arise, and that sooner or later we are reading about someone dying as a result.

It is my hope that the local media will realize that the only way the overall quality of health care in any community will improve is if we insist on the highest quality possible- not on the latest gimmick. Ratings and sales should not compromise the safety of the community which the journalist or publication serves.

The bottom line remains the same though... If you or someone you know is interested in improving their body contour, please, please, PLEASE make sure to find a surgeon certified by The American Board of Plastic Surgery.

This will make a great deal more difference in your safety and outcome than any of the machines being touted by your local eye doctor.


Visit Us:







Follow Us!


Sunday, February 7, 2010

Truth in Medical Education? Part 2

Okay, so in our last entry, I discussed how a combination of factors has led to a situation in which patients are routinely injured or deformed by providers unfit to perform procedures that they market aggressively to an unsuspecting public.

I described these factors to include physician-independent factors, like our nation's growing appetite for new and exciting cosmetic treatments, and the very low ethical standard of medical device manufacturers who are looking for ways to expand profits by selling their machines aggressively to anyone they can- despite the risk to the population of selling their devices to untrained practitioners.

I also described the physician environment factors contributing to this problem, like declining insurance reimbursements for all physicians, the decline in respect and prestige the medical profession has experienced, and the almost inevitable (yet still reprehensible) resultant decline in the ethics and morals of these cash strapped physicians.

I also described how this affects my practice daily- seeing women with preventable injuries and deformities that resulted from plastic surgery procedures performed by urologists, family practice doctors, eye doctors, and in some cases, but individuals who aren't MD's at all!

Today, I want to discuss the larger, societal problems this is going to inevitably lead to, and why, as a second generation surgeon, this is so disturbing to me.

Traditionally, and fundamentally, the practice and profession of medicine is based on public trust, and an implicit agreement between our society and those of us who make the choice to become its caregivers...


We as physicians understand that our course of education and training will be more rigorous than any other profession.

We understand that choosing to enter medicine will require us to largely sacrifice our youth to our dream of helping others, spending almost the entirety of our 20's and early 30's in a hospital learning and gaining experience that will help us be better doctors.

We even understand that in the United States, being a doctor means being constantly aware that the next person we try to help might know a lawyer and try to sue us if things don't go perfectly (what other group of human beings do you know that are expected to never make mistakes?)

We agree to do our level best to treat people and help them through illness or need.

In the past these sacrifices were well-compensated for most. 

Being a doctor meant earning the respect of our patients, but on a larger scale, being a doctor meant you had earned society's respect.

You were viewed as an altruistic person who had studied and shown incredible devotion to help your fellow man and you were honored for this work and sacrifice.

For most, being a doctor also meant that you would lead a financially stable and comfortable (if not wealthy) lifestyle once your training was successfully completed.

Society agrees to hold us in high regard and assure our financial stability.

Somewhere along the way, providers of medical insurance (who in the United States are ALL for-profit companies beholden to shareholders and their bottom lines) figured out that doctors and their inherently altruistic natures could be taken advantage of... and Managed Care was born.


A history of managed care and the many ways it has affected doctors and patients alike is well beyond my point, but let's briefly understand the following:

  • By limiting access to care, managed care has caused the general level of frustration experienced by all involved in healthcare (from patients to nurses and doctors alike) to smolder and burn- to the detriment of the all-important doctor-patient relationship. 
  • The CAUSE of the frustration is out of our hands as doctors, yet WE are the ones who have to deal with the frustrated patient. Their insurer is just a voice on the phone- and most often not even a real human voice.
  • This frustration, and the fact that the insurance company is "in the background", has caused the public perception of doctors to decline.
  • Managed care has led to dramatically reduced physician compensation. 
  • The frustration, decline in compensation to physicians, and loss of societal status has led to physician frustration- and for some, a search for alternative financial gratification.
For these physicians, the fact that in their minds they have already lost the war with the insurers and the government and are being forced to accept ridiculously low compensation has created a hopelessness and lack of faith in the system.

It has also led these frustrated and underpaid physicians to question whether or not their agreement with society is still valid. And so many have chosen to abuse the trust society has placed in all of us as physicians.

In other words, if being a physician no longer means prestige, the respect accorded a scholar, and financial stability, and if it also means daily life is filled with strife and frustration, why should I not do whatever I can to at least be paid better???

Even if this means that I need to call myself a liposuction expert- knowing that my training was in ophthalmology (treatment of disorders of the eye).


By giving up on the system and compromising their ethics and morals to make more money, physicians are themselves now ADDING to the factors causing our public standing to decline over time.

Every time a patient is injured irreversibly because she allowed an eye doctor to convince her he was an expert liposuction surgeon, her trust in our system of medicine as a whole diminishes. Her view of all doctors suffers.

And she is left with a very bad taste in her mouth which she remembers any time the topic of plastic surgery comes up. 

And THAT is what is most disturbing to me... someone who went to the trouble of doing it right... Of actually completing an accredited Plastic Surgery Residency Program... Of taking and passing the American Board of Plastic Surgery Certification Examinations.... Of being as honest and forthright with my patients as possible.

My reputation and that of my specialty is suffering because of the deliberate misrepresentation, poor outcomes and injuries produced by non-plastic surgeons performing plastic surgery.


So what's the bottom line?

If you are interested in a plastic surgery procedure, please know that in the right hands you can be safe and have a very high likelihood of achieving your goal.

It is important to research you surgeon, the facility in which the procedure will be performed, and the anesthesia provider thoroughly (please read my post, "Choosing a Plastic Surgeon, Part 2").

Finally, if you DO choose to have your plastic surgery performed by a doctor without the training necessary to keep you safe and give you the best outcome, know that your Board Certified Plastic Surgeon is ready to offer you whatever help possible to correct your deformity.

GLOSSARY:

A surgeon certified BY THE AMERICAN BOARD OF PLASTIC SURGERY:
     Has completed 3-6 years of general surgery training
     Has completed 2-4 years of residency training in Plastic Surgery of the Eyes, Face AND Body
     Could reasonably be expected to be well trained to do plastic surgery on the eyes, face, or body
  

If a doctor is an OCULOPLASTIC surgeon, he or she:

Completed 3-4 years of residency training in Ophthalmology (they are an EYE DOCTOR),                                                                                                                                                                 followed by 1 year learning to do plastic surgery AROUND THE EYE ONLY. He/she could reasonably be expected to be well trained to do your eyelid surgery.



If a doctor is a FACIAL PLASTIC SURGEON, he or she:

Completed 4-5 years of residency training in Ear, Nose and Throat Surgery, followed by 1 year of 
training in plastic surgery OF THE FACE ONLY. He/she could reasonably be expected to be well trained to do plastic surgery on your eyelids or face.



Visit Us:







Follow Us!